The law firm growing where Big Law retreats

Linklaters spin-out Kinstellar is building a 'major firm for minor markets', with outside investment a possible next step.

The law firm growing where Big Law retreats
Kinstellar senior partner Jason Mogg and managing partner Kristóf Ferenczi (Courtesy photo)
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Starting a law firm is hard enough. Launching one at the height of the global financial crisis, two months after Lehman Brothers collapsed, is another level of difficulty altogether.

You could say Kinstellar has spent much of its nearly 18-year life playing the business of law on hard mode. Born from four Linklaters offices in November 2008 - its name an anagram of the Magic Circle firm - it has since weathered the European debt crisis, a global pandemic and the war in Ukraine, where it expanded just months before Russia’s full-scale invasion.

“We have been pretty good at bad timing,” jokes senior partner and co-founder Jason Mogg.

Yet the firm has kept growing. Its strategy is to build in markets “that are not core” and often overlooked by the biggest international firms. Kinstellar wants to be the firm those larger players turn to for local advice, or a new home for offices they no longer want.

And it has also spent almost two decades running a corporate model that could help fund its next phase of growth.

Speaking to Non-Billable, Mogg and managing partner Kristóf Ferenczi describe an ambition to build a major firm for minor markets, bringing Big Law quality to places the biggest firms don’t tend to prioritise.

From its founding offices in Bratislava, Bucharest, Budapest and Prague, the business has grown to 15 offices across 14 countries, extending into Southern Europe, Central Asia and Southeast Asia. It now has around 450 lawyers and has doubled revenue over the past five years.

For Mogg, a Canadian M&A lawyer who was previously Linklaters’ regional managing partner, the first priority after the spin-out was keeping the lights on - retaining clients and the lawyers who served them. But independence also opened doors. No longer tied to one global network, Kinstellar could build relationships with other international firms and pick up work from across the market.

A partner for the big firms

Ferenczi says roughly 30-40% of revenue comes through referral work from international law firms, with the rest coming from direct clients.

Those clients include large corporates, banks, energy companies and investors expanding beyond their home countries. So the business is about more than picking up the local work on deals run from London or New York.

Still, its relationships with international firms are a big part of the playbook. Ferenczi sees an opportunity as firms put more money and management time into their US and UK businesses - a theme that the current transatlantic merger wave appears to be accelerating.

Kinstellar wants to take over offices in non-core markets - outside of the G7 - that those firms no longer want to run, then keep working with them when their clients need local advice.

A case in point: in 2024, Kinstellar acquired German firm Noerr’s offices in Bratislava, Prague and Bucharest. Noerr cited limited growth in the region as its reason for leaving, while Kinstellar saw exactly the opposite opportunity.

Ferenczi says Kinstellar is regularly talking to international firms about their plans and the markets Kinstellar covers. Sometimes those conversations lead to opportunities, sometimes Kinstellar brings its own ideas to the table.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst Perkins Coie£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£150,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£90,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£55,000£60,000£140,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£120,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£65,000£70,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£108,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£145,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£170,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£52,500£57,500£110,000
Morgan Lewis£57,500£62,500£173,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£140,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£170,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£54,000£59,000£109,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£189,000
Reed Smith£55,000£60,000£135,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£56,000£61,000£130,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£177,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£50,000£54,000£90,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£180,000
Winston Taylor£56,000£61,000£125,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

An office can be profitable and still barely register inside a global giant, but for a firm focused on that market it can be a business worth growing. Mogg says money and management time can secure leading positions in markets he describes as often being “winner takes all”.

That means being picky about where to go next. Kinstellar isn’t ruling out the buoyant Polish market, for instance, but has yet to find the right way in.

“We have always taken the view that we don’t want to be in any market unless we’re at or near the top of it, or we have a route to get there in a reasonably short time,” Mogg says.

Built to keep capital

The corporate model was designed to pay for the firm’s approach to growth. From the start, Kinstellar kept back some of its profits to reinvest in the business, rather than paying everything out to partners each year.

“We didn’t invent a new structure,” Mogg says. “We just used this bog standard structure that is generally used in the business world.”

We just used this bog standard structure that is generally used in the business world.

Being a partner doesn’t automatically mean being an owner. Most people holding the partner title hold shares, though some don’t, while business services leaders can be shareholders too.

The challenge is getting people to buy into the idea that money invested today will be worth more to them later. The firm still has to pay competitively, Mogg says. Self-funding growth cannot come at the expense of attracting and keeping good people.

Ukraine shows what keeping money in the business can mean. After Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, revenue there fell significantly below budget, according to Mogg. Kinstellar continued supporting the office, covering losses that ran into 2023 before the business recovered. Mogg says the firm could draw on its equity to fund that support without dipping into partner pay.

The structure also gives Kinstellar a head start if it decides to take outside investment. Mogg says potential investors see the appeal of a firm that has spent years working this way as it would not have to go through the difficult transition from a traditional partnership first.

But there are limits to what Kinstellar can fund itself, particularly as it looks to expand and invest in AI and legal technology.

Mogg confirms that external investors have approached Kinstellar - including recently - but those have not resulted in external investment to date.

Ferenczi says the firm is considering various ways to fund its expansion.

“To seize the opportunities we see across markets, we may need more capital going forward and we're looking at ways in which that can be secured.”

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
•
5 min read
Advertisement