Ex-Simpson Thacher paralegal rebuked over drink-driving conviction

The SRA has rebuked a former Simpson Thacher paralegal after he was convicted of drink driving and driving without insurance in January 2025.
The regulator said the misconduct was aggravated by a previous drink-driving conviction, but stopped short of imposing a more serious sanction because he had shown insight and remorse.
A former Simpson Thacher paralegal has been rebuked by the SRA after being convicted of drink driving and driving without insurance.
Sam Baker-Harber, who was working as a funds paralegal at the US firm's London office at the time of the offence, pleaded guilty in January last year to drink driving and driving without a valid insurance policy.
He subsequently worked as a paralegal at Proskauer's London office.
According to a decision published by the SRA on 11 June, Baker-Harber was convicted at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court last year over an incident that took place in December 2024.
The court imposed a 12-month community order requiring him to complete 80 hours of unpaid work. He was also disqualified from driving for 40 months and ordered to pay costs and a victim surcharge.
Previous conviction
In its decision, the SRA said Baker-Harber's conduct breached Principle 2 of the SRA Principles, which requires individuals to act in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the profession.
The regulator said the misconduct was aggravated by the fact Baker-Harber had a previous conviction for driving with excess alcohol.
It also noted that the sentence imposed by the court exceeded the more typical outcome of a financial penalty for such offences.
Despite those factors, the SRA concluded that a written rebuke was an appropriate and proportionate sanction. The regulator cited Baker-Harber's insight and remorse as mitigating factors.
He was also ordered to pay £600 towards the SRA's costs.
Join 10,000+ City law professionals who start their day with our newsletter.
The essential read for commercially aware lawyers.


