A legal psychologist on why you should stop trying to be so perfect

Perfectionism may look like high performance in law, but psychologist Dr Catherine Sykes says that ultimately, it limits growth.

A legal psychologist on why you should stop trying to be so perfect
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Perfectionism is less about having high standards and more about the emotional meaning attached to them, with lawyers often linking performance to self-worth.

Over time, what initially boosts performance can lead to burnout, stalled careers and declining confidence.

At first glance, perfectionism looks like a strength in law: attention to detail, relentless standards and an ability to push work to the highest possible level are all traits the profession rewards.

But according to Dr Catherine Sykes, a London-based psychologist who specialises in working with lawyers, the reality is more complicated.

“Perfectionism is when you are no longer getting any benefits from your high standards,” she says. “There’s more detriment than benefit.”

What many lawyers interpret as drive or diligence may in fact be something far more rigid and, ultimately, limiting.

Beyond high standards

Sykes is careful to separate perfectionism from ambition. “There’s nothing wrong with high standards,” she says. “High standards are great.”

The difference lies in where those standards come from and how they feel.

“When you’re operating from high standards, your focus is more on the task,” she explains. “Whereas when you’re focusing on the task from a perfectionist lens, the focus is more on me. So that task means something about me.”

At its core is what she calls a “success rule”, an internal script that ties achievement to identity.

“If I’m not perfect, then I’m not worthy.”

That internal equation transforms everyday work into something much heavier. A draft, a deal or a piece of advice is no longer just work. It becomes a proxy for identity.

On the inside

From the outside, perfectionism often looks indistinguishable from excellence.

Hyper-attentiveness, long hours and consistency are all valued in legal environments. But internally, the experience is very different.

“You’re actually operating from a threat system,” Sykes says. “If I don’t do this perfectly, then I’m at threat. My identity is at threat, my livelihood is at threat and my security is at threat.”

That threat response creates a state of hyper vigilance, where your brain is constantly scanning for problems, risks or mistakes, even when there isn’t an immediate threat.

Instead of feeling calm or focused, you feel like you always have to be “on” - double-checking things, worrying about how others will judge your performance and feeling like you can’t relax, even when things are going well.

“You feel you are constantly being monitored,” she explains. “Externally that can look like diligence.”

The problem is that this state narrows thinking. “You’re only seeing potential for mistakes. You’re not seeing the global picture or thinking outside the box.”

The performance myth

One of the most persistent beliefs in the profession is that perfectionism drives better results.

“There’s a myth that perfectionism fuels performance,” she says. “At first it looks like you’re getting benefits. But you’re actually storing up quite a lot of problems along the way.”

Those problems are often invisible early on. Perfectionists tend to work more, take fewer breaks and maintain high output. But beneath that, strain builds across multiple areas.

The benefits gradually start to disappear.

“It can cause issues with relationships, because you have high expectations of other people,” she says. “You’re storing up relationship problems, health problems, confidence problems, and ultimately performance problems.”

“Perfectionism favours working rather than downtime. But we know that taking breaks makes performance more sustainable.”

Over time, the returns diminish. “There’s a point at which perfectionism starts to impact performance,” she adds. “The benefits gradually start to disappear.”

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£135,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£52,000£57,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£180,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

When growth stalls

The real inflection point often comes later in a lawyer’s career.

Early stages reward precision and task execution, but upward progression requires something else.

“As you progress, you need to grow. You need to step outside your comfort zone,” Sykes says. “Growth always comes with the risk of failure.”`

Growth always comes with the risk of failure.

That is where perfectionism becomes a barrier.

“The biggest fear is failure,” she explains. So instead, lawyers often double down on what already feels safe.

“They perfect their comfort zone more and more, rather than stretching into what might be needed.”

The result can be a quiet plateau. “You get stuck, you become dissatisfied, you’re not challenging yourself and that gets noticed.”

The hidden cost

Perfectionism does not just affect performance, it also reshapes how lawyers experience success.

“One of the biggest issues with perfectionism is you don’t acknowledge success,” Sykes says. “Nothing is ever a great job.”

That has a cumulative effect. “You’re not storing any success memories,” she explains. “So each time you go into something new, it’s like you’re starting from scratch.”

Some people feel like they don’t know who they are anymore.

Over time, that can erode confidence. The breaking point varies by person, but there are consistent patterns.

“Burnout, imposter syndrome, relationship issues, confidence dips,” she lists. “Some people feel like they don’t know who they are anymore.”

In more acute cases, it can manifest physically.

“Some people have panic attacks. The body copes with stress up to a point, but then it says no.”

Root causes

Sykes points to a combination of factors linked to developing perfectionism: genetics, social conditioning, neurodivergence and early experiences where approval is tied to achievement.

“There are messages from a very early age that if you lead a perfect life, you’ll be happy,” she says.

For some, there is also a cognitive component, where some people naturally focus on the small details rather than the bigger picture.

Because of that, they’re more likely to spot tiny flaws or things that aren’t quite right, details that other people might not even notice, and fixate on the imperfections.

The legal profession then amplifies these tendencies.

“What makes you a great lawyer can also be very detrimental for your health,” she says. “Attention to detail is essential. But if you can’t see the wood for the trees, that’s where problems arise.”

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000

A growth mindset

Addressing perfectionism is not about lowering standards, but rather it’s about changing the meaning attached to them.

An ideal outcome, Sykes says, is developing a growth mindset.

“Failure is part of growth. But to have a growth mindset, you have to be okay with failure,” she says.

That is often easier said than done.

“If failure means so much about you, you won’t enter into that mindset because of the fear.”

She says that even in the case of actual failure, the experience has value.

“The feelings from failure give you information about who you are and what you want,” she says. “That information is useful if you allow it in.”

When it backfires

For many lawyers, perfectionism works until it does not. The challenge is recognising that shift early enough to respond. In a profession built on precision, the instinct is often to double down, to work harder, refine further and eliminate risk.

But as Sykes makes clear, the real risk may lie in doing exactly that.

At some point, the same traits that drive success begin to limit it. And the question becomes not how to be perfect, but how to move beyond it.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read