Turning legal into a revenue driver: Wordsmith CEO Ross McNairn on the future of in-house and building a $100m legal AI company

Ex-lawyer and Wordsmith founder Ross McNairn is on a mission to transform in-house legal teams.

Turning legal into a revenue driver: Wordsmith CEO Ross McNairn on the future of in-house and building a $100m legal AI company
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Wordsmith has quickly become one of the most closely watched legal AI startups in Europe. The Edinburgh-based company recently closed a $25 million Series A round led by VC firm Index Ventures - bringing its total raised to $30 million - and hit a $100 million valuation, making it the fastest Scottish startup to do so (according to the company).

But unlike many AI-first legal tech companies going after law firms or litigation automation, Wordsmith is betting on a very specific user: the in-house lawyer.

"We're built for in-house legal teams, specifically", says Ross McNairn, Wordsmith’s co-founder and CEO in a conversation for The Non-Billable Podcast. "We built an AI assistant that helps their in-house lawyers get more productive in their individual work, but also - critically - in how they interact with the rest of the business."

Listen to the full-length interview on the podcast. Episode page with links here.

At its core, Wordsmith is an AI platform designed to triage the constant flow of inbound legal requests from across a company - via Slack or email  - and either respond to them autonomously or support a lawyer in doing so. "Most of your pain [in-house] is not contained in your laptop. It's the inbound and the noise and the other things that come your way. So Wordsmith helps with that."

A different problem

McNairn, who trained as a lawyer in Scotland, says the idea for Wordsmith came from watching legal teams struggle while working inside a fast-growing company. "I saw a lot of people that were super bright and capable with just very poor tooling", he says. "I felt what happened when you had legal in a good place and legal in a bad place."

What makes in-house legal unique, he argues, is how central (and exposed) they are to business functions. "They're kind of the heart of a company. And if your heart's not beating properly, the whole company suffers from it."

This is also why he believes Wordsmith’s value extends beyond productivity. "If legal becomes highly productive in a business, every deal speeds up. The CEO gets super happy. Other execs are delighted with it. The impact is way bigger if you can crack it for that goal."

If legal becomes highly productive in a business, every deal speeds up. The CEO gets super happy.
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin Gump£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£47,000£52,000£102,000
Bristows£46,000£50,000£88,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Burges Salmon£47,000£49,000£72,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£50,000£53,000£88,000
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton£57,500£62,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£47,000£49,500£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£170,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£50,000£54,000£100,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£46,000£50,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£47,000£49,000£88,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£95,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£50,000£54,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,000£45,000£76,000
Jones Day£56,000£65,000£160,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£55,000£60,000£165,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£135,000
McDermott Will & Emery£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£45,000£47,000£82,000
Mischon de Reya£47,500£52,500£95,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£50,000£55,000£135,000
Orrick£55,000£60,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£54,500£56,000£94,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£55,000£60,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£49,500£54,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£50,000£55,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£60,000£65,000£165,000
RPC£46,000£50,000£90,000
Shoosmiths£43,000£45,000£97,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£52,000£57,000£120,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£173,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£47,000£50,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£100,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£50,000£55,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£45,000£49,000£80,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£50,000£55,000£102,000
Weightmans£34,000£36,000£70,000
Weil Gotshal & Manges£60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£170,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,010,000,000£2,400,000
2Clifford Chance£2,300,000,000£2,040,000
3A&O Shearman£2,200,000,000£2,200,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,150,000,000£2,200,000
5Freshfields£2,120,000,000Not disclosed
6Linklaters£2,100,000,000£1,900,000
7Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000£1,100,000
8CMS**£1,620,000,000Not disclosed
9Herbert Smith Freehills£1,300,000,000£1,300,000
10Ashurst£961,000,000£1,300,000
11Clyde & Co£844,000,000£739,000
12Eversheds Sutherland£749,000,000£1,300,000
13BCLP*£661,000,000£748,000
14Pinsent Masons£649,000,000£793,000
15Slaughter and May***£625,000,000Not disclosed
16Simmons & Simmons£574,000,000£1,076,000
17Bird & Bird**£545,000,000£696,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£495,000,000Not disclosed
19Taylor Wessing£480,000,000£915,000***
20Osborne Clarke**£456,000,000£771,000
21Womble Bond Dickinson£448,000,000£556,000
22DWF£435,000,000Not disclosed
23Fieldfisher£407,000,000£966,000
24Kennedys£384,000,000Not disclosed
25DAC Beachcroft£325,000,000£700,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

How it works

Wordsmith is built as a legal co-pilot, but acts more like a team of AI agents, each trained for specific workflows like NDA reviews, third-party supplier contracts or employment contracts. "We give them a workspace that individually speeds them up", McNairn explains. "We're awesome with documents - drafting, reviewing - but we also integrate with all the systems in a business."

When a request comes in from another part of the company, Wordsmith’s AI does the initial review, drafts redlines or summary responses, and tees it up for a lawyer to approve or send - or in some cases, handles the reply automatically under strict controls.

"We keep the lawyer in the loop with a sort of dead man switch", McNairn says. "The AI can do everything in the flow, but you can insert yourself and monitor it. You also get the productivity gains."

This "bouncer with a law degree" model, as one GC described it, helps to filter the more commoditised tasks which should leave the human lawyers with the chance to work on the highest-value things. "It’s turning everybody from being authors into being editors for repetitive tasks."

It’s turning everybody from being authors into being editors for repetitive tasks.

Getting customers

Wordsmith’s traction is mainly driven by word of mouth referrals, rather than a traditional B2B sales process. "We don’t really sell in that sense", he says. "Legal buyers don’t trust legal tech. GCs talk, they all know each other, and they’re used to buying off reputation. We optimised for their success more than anything else."

The strategy appears to be working. McNairn says Wordsmith’s retention and usage numbers are among the highest in the industry, with some legal teams clocking over 90% weekly usage. "This isn’t a tool that people buy and then put on the shelf. Once they taste it, they want more."

Trustpilot was one of the company’s earliest customers. "They process tens of thousands of inbound communications, and now they can review every request, which was impossible before. They’ve trained agents to scan, highlight, and flag them to legal. It’s pretty epic."

Remote.com, another customer, uses Wordsmith agents to assist with sales enablement, contract review and internal legal queries. Their legal ops people have almost become legal AI engineers, "they train agents for breakfast", McNairn laughs. "There’s a whole generation of new people learning this stuff."

A different kind of legal support team

To support customers, Wordsmith has a legal intelligence team in-house. "Kind of like a McKinsey for Law", says McNairn. Each new customer gets a "hit squad" made up of a legal ops engineer, a senior lawyer (often 8+ PQE), and one of the founders or senior leads to support.

Many of the legal hires at Wordsmith are former City lawyers - and the company is on the look out for more talent. "Everyone who joins is doing it for one of three reasons", he says. "They want to be part of something cool. They want the financial upside - mostly through equity. Or they want to retrain and be on the cutting edge of how to use AI."

Hitting a $100 million valuation

Wordsmith’s $25 million Series A round in June came together quickly with Index Ventures, who also backed the company’s pre-seed round. "We spoke to Index and they gave us a check", McNairn says, only half-joking. "They’re one of the very best investors in Europe. We pitched, they called me afterwards, and we were like, let’s do it."

Despite a flood of inbound VC interest, McNairn says the focus is on keeping things lean and execution-focused. "This is about getting set up to build a really good company that’s lean and deploys in a smart way", he says. Most of the capital will go to product development, engineering and legal intelligence - plus some US expansion later this year.

"We’ll open up in the States toward the end of this year. New York. We’re getting so much inbound right now from the US, we need to meet that."

Where legal AI is heading

McNairn is sceptical of some of the legal AI hype. Redlining tools specifically. "I think redlining is overhyped right now," he says. "It’s harder to do well than people appreciate, and a lot of people are buying and getting disappointed."

He also sees the market starting to segment clearly between in-house and law firm solutions. "Law firms spend way more on research. You can sign million-dollar deals for breakfast. In-house is harder, lower ACVs [annual contract values], more fragmented, but still 40% of the space. That’s big enough for us."

He expects the broader legal AI space to follow the same path as other SaaS booms. "There’ll be this early wave where spaghetti hits the wall. Then, two or three years from now, those who invested well in fundamentals are going to emerge from the far side super strong."

McNairn has no doubt Wordsmith will be one of them, and he thinks the company's laser focus on in-house teams will get it there. "The fastest way for us to sink ourselves is to get greedy and try to take the entire planet. We’re completely fanatical about making sure we’re the best thing an in-house legal team can buy."

When asked where Wordsmith will be by 2030, "We’ll be the default", he says. "You start a job as an in-house lawyer, it’ll be like Salesforce for sales people. You’ll say, ‘I don’t have Wordsmith - I’m going to struggle to run this operation.’"

There’ll be this early wave where spaghetti hits the wall. Then, two or three years from now, [legal tech companies] who invested well in fundamentals are going to emerge from the far side super strong.
FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000

This is a condensed version of our full length interview with Ross McNairn on The Non-Billable Podcast. View the episode page here.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
•
5 min read