The ex-Kirkland lawyer fixing the unglamorous side of private funds

How former City funds lawyer Amr Jomaa turned a 3am late night in the office into legal tech startup Navys.

The ex-Kirkland lawyer fixing the unglamorous side of private funds
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

London-based startup Navys, fresh off a $1 million pre-seed round backed by The LegalTech Fund, is targeting a niche but fast-growing pressure point in private markets: limited partner (LP) transfers.

The secondaries market has expanded rapidly in recent years as investors seek earlier liquidity and portfolio rebalancing, making LP transfers a far more regular part of fund operations.

Deal volumes surged 41% in 2025 to $226 billion and are expected to double by 2030. Investor EQT’s recent $3.7 billion acquisition of secondaries giant Coller Capital is a telling sign of how central the market has become.

That context helps explain both the opportunity founder and former Kirkland & Ellis lawyer Amr Jomaa sees and why his background matters. Kirkland is widely regarded as one of the most demanding and sophisticated training grounds for funds lawyers, exposing associates early to complex structures, high-volume deal flow and some of the biggest names in private capital. It is also, by design, a place people do not leave lightly.

Though Jomaa is not the only former Kirkland lawyer to strike out on his own. Former London Kirkland private equity partner Joel Arnell, raised a $5.5 million seed round for Dealstack, a software platform aimed at automating workflows in private capital deals.

Against that backdrop, Jomaa is clear about what he is not trying to build. When I sat down with him, the conversation quickly moved away from artificial intelligence and towards something far less glamorous.

His ambition, he told me, is not to build another general-purpose legal tech tool, but rather "the brain behind the funds" - starting with one of the most process-heavy and least-loved parts of private markets: LP transfers.

What began as a late-night frustration during his time as a Kirkland funds associate became a broader rethink of how things should work. We talked about why lawyers spend so much time on non-legal tasks, why a lot of AI talk is fluff, how secondaries are changing the game and his own perspective on risk eventually pushing him to step away from the partnership track to build a different kind of business.

Building the brain behind funds

"The endgame for me is to build the legal operating system for funds - the brain behind funds," he says. The ambition extends far beyond any single workflow, but the company is starting with LP transfers, using one of the most process-heavy corners of private markets as a wedge into a much larger vision.

Useful before sexy

Rather than leading with artificial intelligence, the focus is on something more fundamental. "In order to have the AI layer on top of the funds, you need a pre-step which is to structure that data in a manner that works for everyone," he says. The sequencing matters.

"Number one is the infrastructure for funds and layer two is AI and intelligence."

"There’s a lot of hype in legal tech around AI and a lot of it is just marketing," he says. His instinct has been to resist that temptation. "We’re trying to build systems that are useful before we build systems that are sexy."

There’s a lot of hype in legal tech around AI and a lot of it is just marketing.

The work behind the work

The idea emerged directly out of his own experience as a practising lawyer. "When I was a funds lawyer at Kirkland, I noticed one of the biggest pain points was LP transfers," he says.

One particular transaction crystallised that frustration. "It was 29th December 2024 at 3am and I was doing an LP transfer, and I thought, surely there’s a better way to do this. It can’t be so inefficient to do something that is basically just back and forth."

In practice, much of the time spent on LP transfers has little to do with legal analysis. "A lot of time spent on transfers is just process," he says. "It’s chasing signatures, creating PDFs and going back and forth on ‘have you signed this, we need to sign this, you need to sign that, the PDFs didn’t combine.’"

Email, for now, acts as the default infrastructure. "It’s just done on email and I don’t think that’s the most efficient way," he adds. "It’s about 150–200 emails per transfer."

Solving his own problem

The idea for the product began as a personal tool he wished he had while at Kirkland. "I’ve always done a bit of coding on the side and with AI, I was able to do a lot more." From there, the scope expanded. "I thought there’s so much more we can do."

Secondaries are changing the game

The bet on this type of technology is reinforced by structural shifts in private markets. "Private equity is a very illiquid market and conceptually, it’s supposed to be illiquid," he says. Over time, however, that assumption has softened. "It’s become more democratised for investors to move money around for whatever reason. The secondaries market exponentially grew from almost nothing to a huge, separate business."

Liquidity pressures have only accelerated that trend. "Some funds haven’t been able to return enough money to their LPs so they need liquidity, so some leave the fund because they need cash," he says. "People need liquidity and it just makes sense for this market to grow."

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£47,000£49,000£88,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£50,000£54,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£45,000£47,000£84,000
Mischon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£135,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£60,000£65,000£165,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£52,000£57,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£170,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Walking away from law

The decision to step away from private practice came with obvious trade-offs. "I was on a good track to make partner," he says. What tipped the balance was a long-term perspective. "I always think about things that I will regret at the end of my career. I thought if I don’t do this now, I’ll regret it when I’m 80. There’s a lot of risk involved - giving up your career, a good salary and now it’s all uncertain," he adds.

Inside the company, that uncertainty is acknowledged openly. "In our office, we have a motto: ‘do you believe?’ We ask each other all the time because it’s almost an absurd belief that it’s going to work out."

In our office, we have a motto: ‘do you believe?’

A changing relationship with risk

That willingness to step away from the security of a defined career path is shaped by his personal history. "I grew up in Lebanon and there is a financial crisis there - a lot of people’s money is stuck in banks," he says. "My parents worked their whole lives and saved for their retirement, and they just lost it like that."

The lesson was about how easily security can evaporate. "That made me realise that I may be sacrificing these startup ideas and plans that I have for financial certainty, but it could also be lost at any moment." He sees a broader shift underway. "There are more and more people like me leaving safe, secure jobs to do something novel."

On raising capital

Before raising capital, the focus was on testing demand. "Before we even started raising money, we were trying to sell the product vision to see whether there was interest in the market to have an LP transfer solution," he says. Those conversations often took an unexpected turn. "A lot of our sales meetings ended up being investor meetings. They said, ‘I am also interested in investing, are you taking any investments?’"

"That’s how we started fundraising - we initially bootstrapped some of it." The cap table reflects that approach. "The people on our cap table are people that know the pain points inside and out and are operators in this space."

A collaborative platform

Corporate work, unlike litigation, is inherently collaborative. "We want the same thing which is to sign this contract as fast as possible. That’s the idea behind Navys," he says.

If it works, the impact should be tangible for fund managers. "I want the GP, the fund managers to say, because we’re using Navys, we’re able to have less friction with investors and LPs and basically become more successful."

The platform is designed to serve all the participants involved in the transfer - fund managers, investment firms, buyers and sellers of LP interest, law firms and administrators and advisors, and eventually the investment banks like Evercore and Lazard.

Less grind, more real work

"Law attracts very smart, very academic, hard-working people," he says, but the reality can disappoint. "I went to law school thinking I was going to be doing all these interesting cases and transactions, and that turns out to be about 10% of the job as a junior. You get into these jobs and find yourself doing a lot of non-legal work, pushing paper."

Clients of law firms are also asking for law firms to modernise. The traditional model, he argues, is increasingly hard to justify. "It makes almost no sense now to keep doing manual repetitive tasks that require almost no legal work and billing your client £1,000 an hour."

It makes no sense now to keep doing manual repetitive tasks that require almost no legal work and billing your client £1,000 an hour.

In his view, that balance should reverse. "The legal work that lawyers will be doing in the future will be real legal work, which is the stuff you want to be paying someone £1,000 an hour for - analysis, arguments, thinking about the transaction from a macro perspective."

There may be fewer billable hours, he accepts, but they would consist of more meaningful, valuable work.

Life beyond law

There are elements of practising law he misses. "I miss working with my old colleagues," he says, but the change has brought variety. "At law firms, you work with other lawyers. Now, I work with engineers, with marketing, and I find that it’s really interesting to learn about other jobs."

"I don’t miss the lack of variety and creativity." The part of the job he wants to preserve is the one that drew him to law in the first place. "I will miss that 10% - the very interesting work of sitting with the client and trying to strategise about the next fundraise."

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
•
5 min read
Advertisement