Meet the junior lawyers putting AI to work inside A&O Shearman

Associates in the firm’s innovation group share how they moved into AI and what the job actually involves.

Meet the junior lawyers putting AI to work inside A&O Shearman
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Law firms talk about AI all the time, but what you hear less about is the day-to-day reality. Once the partnership is announced and the platform is rolled out, the real work of integration begins.

After the rollout, the work becomes practical as prompts are refined against live documents, outputs are checked against the playbook, and a model’s answer is compared to what a senior associate would have drafted.

At A&O Shearman, that process started early. The firm was Harvey’s first major UK law firm customer, building on a longer track record of investing in legal tech and internal innovation. The firm began experimenting with Harvey in September 2022, sandboxing the product and developing security and governance frameworks before rolling it out more broadly.

Much of that work now sits inside the Markets Innovation Group, known internally as MIG, a 27-person multidisciplinary team of lawyers, developers and innovation specialists building internal tools and client-facing AI products. The group is led by partner David Wakeling, who is also the firm’s global lead for AI Advisory.

Inside MIG, much of the work of turning AI from theory into something lawyers actually use happens at associate level. We spoke to three associates about how they found their way into the team and what the job really looks like behind the scenes.

Susannah McMillan

“My work went from explaining what AI was to governance and guardrails.”

McMillan’s route into MIG started when a corporate partner asked her to look at Harvey and think about how the team might use it.

“I really loved that task,” she says. She joined MIG for her fourth seat and stayed. “I’ll be in the team for three years in March.”

In that time, she has seen the conversation around AI shift significantly.

“When I joined the team, I was joining calls to show clients Harvey and clients were saying what is generative AI? How does it work?”

Her work went from explaining what AI was to governance and guardrails.

From there, the team moved into product. She worked on A&O’s ContractMatrix, a SaaS Word add-in product, built in partnership with Harvey and Microsoft that is used internally and licensed to clients.

The associate role inside that product journey is different from a traditional seat. It includes demos, client conversations and what she describes as building relationships with clients, speaking to them about how to deploy AI and running product tutorials.

The questions she fields today are very different from those early demos.

“Clients are no longer thinking about chatbots or more kind of straightforward use cases. It’s deploying AI in a much more sophisticated way to help clients with very specific pain points.”

She has also noticed a shift internally. What began as something enthusiasts explored on the side has become something lawyers invest in deliberately.

“At the very start of AI being rolled out, it was a passion project for individuals who were open to using AI and excited about AI.”

Now, she says, “there’s been a recognition that it can actually really be helpful and useful for your career.”

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£135,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£52,000£57,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£170,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Emma Jing

“I liked the uncertainty of it. When I sat in other teams, I kind of knew what the work might involve in a few years’ time.”

Jing is nearly one and a half years qualified, though she didn’t study law or come from a tech background.

“I didn’t do a law degree at university, nor did I do a STEM or tech degree. I came into this from a history politics background and trained at the firm,” she says.

She first encountered generative AI as a trainee, when the firm rolled out Harvey.

“We got Harvey when I was a trainee. I think from the very start, I was quite aware of AI filtering into the legal space and there was a lot of buzz around gen AI.”

When it came to choosing seats, she actively favoured MIG.

“I liked the uncertainty of it. When I sat in other teams, I kind of knew what the work might involve in a few years’ time as an associate, as a senior associate. I think with MIG, there was that little bit of like, oh, I don’t know what’s next.”

Now her days are a mix of client-facing, billable projects and internal work.

“Today, for instance, I’m working on a client project, looking at a set of their negotiated agreements against their playbook and their template and using AI to work out how much it deviates and producing some stats on that.”

Alongside that is the equally important work of internal adoption.

“It’s kind of a balancing act between making people aware of the risks, but also encouraging them to actually use it and seeing all the potential it has,” she says.

The aim, she says, is to move people beyond surface-level chatbot use.

“Using it not just as like a chatbot, but thinking about how they can integrate it into processes.”

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000

Jade Low

“It seemed like a really natural fit to go from solutions in engineering to legal solutions.”

Low started in engineering before pivoting into law. For her, MIG felt like a logical extension of her engineering degree into law.

“I always thought I'd become a normal engineer and then when I became a normal engineer, I realised I didn’t get to talk to people very much,” she says.

From there, she did a summer vacation scheme at A&O.

“When I first pivoted toward a law career and heard about MIG, it seemed like a natural fit to go from solutions in engineering to legal solutions, making use of my engineering background, while making life a bit easier for lawyers and clients.”

She is now on a hybrid qualification route, splitting her time between funds and MIG. That dual role gives her a clear view of where the friction points lie and working inside a funds team, she pushes adoption in practical ways.

“As I've been working in the funds team, I can really start to see the existing pain points felt by funds lawyers with really manual processes, such as reviewing and comparing investor side letters, that can really benefit from automation,” she says.

She has also hosted training sessions focused on prompting for colleagues as the firm regularly changes the way they prompt based on updates to the models. And perhaps most notably, she has seen the shift in mindset within traditionally conservative practice areas.

“Even in sort of retro areas such as funds, which have historically been resistant to automation, clients are starting to get really interested in AI and how to use it and how to prompt better.”

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read