'We never had a business plan': How Quinn Emanuel became a $2bn law firm by doing one thing well

Quinn Emanuel co-founder John Quinn on building a global litigation powerhouse without a business plan - and why focus beats scale.

'We never had a business plan': How Quinn Emanuel became a $2bn law firm by doing one thing well
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

When John Quinn and three colleagues left a small New York firm to strike out on their own in 1986, they didn't have any grand aspirations to build the world's top disputes-only law firm.

Quinn had opened a one-lawyer outpost in Los Angeles for the firm they worked for, on the assumption that work would follow. It didn’t. "They thought they would have a lot of work in LA. Turns out they didn’t," Quinn recalls. "So we really had to kind of scramble to keep ourselves busy."

That scramble led to the founding of Quinn Emanuel and, initially at least, there was no plan to specialise. "At the beginning, we didn’t really know this would be a litigation-only firm," Quinn says. "It wasn’t for some time that we realised that this was a really powerful model and decided that we would really stick with that."

Listen to the full-length interview on the podcast. Episode page with links here.

The niche full-service firms wouldn’t touch

Quinn Emanuel’s litigation-only model emerged from a practical observation about conflicts - as well as a gap in the market.

Quinn says the firm made a "deliberate decision" to go after claims against the world’s largest commercial banks, an area most full-service firms avoided. "Full service firms wouldn’t touch claims against those banks because of course they have corporate transactional practices," he says. "Partners in those practices really want to do their deal work so they’re not going to litigate against the Goldman Sachses of the world."

That created "an unmet need in the marketplace," Quinn says, and the firm filled it. "That’s turned out to be a very good niche for us actually."

Outside of that, Quinn Emanuel has long overlapped with the biggest firms on clients. "We represent a lot of very large institutions, such as Google or Qualcomm or very large hedge funds like Citadel," Quinn says. But on banks, Quinn Emanuel’s positioning was deliberately sharper: "The one area where we are consistently up against big law firms and big law firm clients are the world’s largest money centre banks."

That clarity helped in marketing and in recruiting. "Our message was a very simple one," he says. "We do one thing and we think we’re the best or among the best at that." Full-service firms, by contrast, "all kind of sound the same."

Our message was a very simple one - we do one thing and we think we’re the best or among the best at that.

A focus that made the firm easier to run

The disputes-only model also has operational advantages.

At full-service firms, Quinn says, specialisation can make partners strangers to each other’s work. "Deal lawyers don’t really understand what litigators do and vice versa," he says. At Quinn Emanuel, "we’re all litigators, so we understood each other in our practices."

That cohesion mattered as the firm expanded. Quinn points to milestone growth moves: building a major patent litigation practice after opening in Silicon Valley in the 1990s, opening New York in 2001, then London in 2008, just before the financial crisis gave the office early momentum.

"That was a good calling card for us when we first opened in London and we were seen as kind of an anti-bank practice," he says, though the office is "diversified far beyond that now."

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£47,000£52,000£102,000
Bristows£46,000£50,000£88,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Burges Salmon£47,000£49,000£72,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£50,000£53,000£88,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£47,000£49,500£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£170,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£50,000£54,000£100,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£46,000£50,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£47,000£49,000£88,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£95,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£50,000£54,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,000£45,000£76,000
Jones Day£56,000£65,000£160,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£55,000£60,000£165,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£45,000£47,000£82,000
Mischon de Reya£47,500£52,500£95,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£50,000£55,000£135,000
Orrick£55,000£60,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£54,500£56,000£94,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£55,000£60,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£49,500£54,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£50,000£55,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£60,000£65,000£165,000
RPC£46,000£50,000£90,000
Shoosmiths£43,000£45,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£52,000£57,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£173,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£47,000£50,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£100,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£50,000£55,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£45,000£49,000£80,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£50,000£55,000£102,000
Weightmans£34,000£36,000£70,000
Weil Gotshal & Manges£60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£170,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,010,000,000£2,400,000
2Clifford Chance£2,300,000,000£2,040,000
3A&O Shearman£2,200,000,000£2,200,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,150,000,000£2,200,000
5Freshfields£2,120,000,000Not disclosed
6Linklaters£2,100,000,000£1,900,000
7Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000£1,100,000
8CMS**£1,620,000,000Not disclosed
9Herbert Smith Freehills£1,300,000,000£1,300,000
10Ashurst£961,000,000£1,300,000
11Clyde & Co£844,000,000£739,000
12Eversheds Sutherland£749,000,000£1,300,000
13BCLP*£661,000,000£748,000
14Pinsent Masons£649,000,000£793,000
15Slaughter and May***£625,000,000Not disclosed
16Simmons & Simmons£574,000,000£1,076,000
17Bird & Bird**£545,000,000£696,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£495,000,000Not disclosed
19Taylor Wessing£480,000,000£915,000***
20Osborne Clarke**£456,000,000£771,000
21Womble Bond Dickinson£448,000,000£556,000
22DWF£435,000,000Not disclosed
23Fieldfisher£407,000,000£966,000
24Kennedys£384,000,000Not disclosed
25DAC Beachcroft£325,000,000£700,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Growth without the corporate playbook

The firm's growth strategy, Quinn says, has never followed a traditional corporate approach.

"We’ve never had a business plan at our firm, at any time, full stop," he says. "Our business plan always was to identify and recruit the best possible lawyers wherever, and pursue good opportunities wherever we saw them."

That sits in contrast with his early impressions of the Magic Circle in London. "They had these business plans - three-year, five-year plans, whole layers of people," he says. "You’d go to any self-respecting large English law firm and there in reception would be a rack of multi-coloured brochures. This was all a revelation to me."

He’s not convinced the effort pays off. "I do wonder whether there’s a lot of effort that goes into those types of marketing and ‘planning’ activities that may or may not really bear fruit," he says.

Our business plan always was to identify and recruit the best possible lawyers and pursue good opportunities wherever we saw them.

What US litigation has that the UK doesn’t

Quinn also offers a reminder that US and UK litigation only look similar from a distance. When he first explored London, he assumed it would be straightforward. "They speak English here. They use words like common law," he says. "They call discovery disclosure."

He later realised "I didn’t have a clue. The process, the procedure, the legal culture is so fundamentally different." He credits London founding partners Richard East and Sue Prevezer with helping him understand what it would take to succeed in the UK market.

Among the biggest practical differences he cites is depositions. "I can send out a notice of deposition and have the CEO, chairman of the board, whoever, show up in my office, be put under oath, be videotaped while I ask questions," Quinn says. "That is super powerful."

That evidence-gathering tool can also force settlement decisions sooner. It "helps both sides to handicap the values, strengths, and weaknesses of their cases and come to resolution if one’s possible."

Costs are different too. The default in the US is "each side pays their own costs, it’s not a loser pays system," Quinn says - a structure that makes it easier to bring "marginal claims" than in England.

'A really stupid business'

For all the complexity of elite-level legal work, Quinn thinks the business underneath it remains simple.

"Law is a really stupid business in some ways," he says. "We’re taking people with legal talent and putting them together with people with legal problems and charging for their time by the hour."

It’s also not capital intensive. "We don’t really have any assets," Quinn says, aside from leases. "Your only assets - the only things that matter - are the talent and wits and judgement of your lawyers."

That simplicity makes current market shifts easier to read. Quinn sees "greater concentration - the strong are getting stronger," driven partly by laterals and the "new" phenomenon of paying star partners "north of 20 million a year." Not many firms can afford it, he says, and the result is "the richer going to get richer."

Compensation trends are shifting too. The traditional lockstep partnership model, he argues, is hard to sustain because portable books can be "picked off" if partners don’t feel paid "commensurate with their profitability contribution."

It's a stupid business. We take people with legal talent and put them together with people with legal problems and charge for their time by the hour.

The trait Quinn thinks matters most

Asked what makes a great lawyer, Quinn doesn’t talk about charisma or credentials. "The single most important thing, frankly, is judgement," he says - the ability to predict how a judge or jury will react, and to "distance yourself from your own prejudices and the influences of your client."

The second ingredient is less glamorous: work. "Doing this at the highest level is super labour intensive and super demanding," he says. "You have to be prepared to sweat the details and burn the midnight oil."

If Quinn Emanuel’s origin story has a through-line, it’s that the firm didn’t win by trying to do everything. It won by finding an unmet need, repeating a simple message, and building a culture around one craft.

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000

This is a condensed version of our full length interview with John Quinn on The Non-Billable Podcast. View the episode page here.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
•
5 min read
Advertisement