A different model for elite litigation: Natasha Harrison on running Pallas

The Pallas founder discusses building a transatlantic litigation firm that competes with Big Law without becoming it.

A different model for elite litigation: Natasha Harrison on running Pallas
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Four years after her high-profile breakaway from elite US litigation boutique Boies Schiller, Natasha Harrison has built Pallas Partners into a top-tier London-New York specialist disputes firm that regularly goes toe-to-toe with Magic Circle and leading US firms at the top of the market. 

She believes that focus, not scale, is the winning formula, and has no interest in expanding beyond the firm’s two offices or growing past 100 lawyers.

In this interview, she reflects on where Pallas stands today, what she is seeing in the disputes landscape, how her career at US firms in London has shaped the firm’s structure, and why working at Pallas is not for everyone.

Harrison left Boies Schiller Flexner in 2022, taking 27 staff with her to launch litigation boutique Pallas Partners, in a disputes market dominated by full-service firms.

“My original plan was to open the London and New York offices on the same day,” she says. In the end, she decided to stagger the launches, with New York opening six months later.

Four years on, the firm has around 65 staff across its two offices focusing on high-value commercial litigation, finance and restructuring disputes, and shareholder and securities claims.

Competing at the top

Pallas operates as a disputes-only boutique and regularly acts against Magic Circle firms and elite US firms, as well as co-counselling with them.

“We litigate with and against the big firms on a very regular basis, including Magic Circle firms, leading US firms as well as Quinn Emanuel. We’re really playing at the very top end of the market” she says.

That positioning is still relatively uncommon in the UK market. While the US has long had a deep bench of specialist litigation boutiques, London has fewer firms operating consistently at the top end of disputes without sitting within a broader full-service platform.

“The US is saturated with litigation boutiques, but there aren’t very many here in the UK. It’s been an opportunity for us to fill a gap in the market,” she says.

Where disputes are emerging

The firm’s caseload mirrors wider trends in the disputes market. Harrison has seen increased activity in finance disputes, particularly those arising from liability management exercises, where companies restructure or amend their debt outside formal insolvency processes, often triggering conflicts between majority and minority creditors.

“There’s a huge uptick there,” she says. “There are lots of potentially untested areas of law, areas that are ripe for development.”

There are lots of potentially untested areas of law, areas that are ripe for development.

Pallas is also acting for groups of Credit Suisse bondholders in ongoing Swiss proceedings arising from the controversial write-down of their bonds during the bank’s government-backed 2023 rescue and takeover by UBS. 

A marquee shareholder claim

One of the firm’s most significant matters is a £2 billion claim against Anglo-Swiss global mining and commodity trading giant Glencore, brought on behalf of institutional investors who say the company failed to disclose material information relating to corruption and bribery misconduct and associated risks.

Pallas is acting for the claimants alongside Quinn Emanuel, Stewarts and BCLP, with Clifford Chance representing Glencore.

Harrison calls it a marquee claim for English law. A preliminary dispute over whether Glencore can rely on legal privilege to withhold documents from shareholder claimants has now progressed to the Supreme Court.

While shareholder actions are still far more common in the US, driven by an opt-out class action system, Harrison believes the UK is edging in the same direction. Even within an opt-in framework, institutional investors are increasingly prepared to act collectively.

“It’s been slower to evolve, but it is now gathering momentum,” she says.

Staying small by design

Despite expanding across two major financial centres, Pallas has set clear limits on how large it wants to become. Harrison has been explicit that once a firm grows beyond a certain size, it stops functioning as a boutique.

“Once you are above 100 lawyers, you are not a boutique,” she says.

Once you are above 100 lawyers, you are not a boutique.

The firm’s long-term aim is a roughly even balance between London and New York, with around 40 lawyers in each office.

At that size, she says “you can handle very large matters without tripping into that grey area of not being a boutique and not being a Big Law firm”.

There are also no plans to open offices beyond London and New York. While Pallas litigates globally, it does so through local counsel rather than its own international footprint.

The UK has relatively few standalone litigation boutiques, but even in the US, where the model is more developed, most are structured as domestic practices rather than transatlantic firms.

“We offer something very unique for a boutique and that’s New York-London access,” she says.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£47,000£49,000£88,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£50,000£54,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£45,000£47,000£84,000
Mischon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£135,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£60,000£65,000£165,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£52,000£57,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£170,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

The US imprint

Despite being based in London, Harrison has spent the majority of her career at US firms, first at Weil and Bingham McCutchen (now Morgan Lewis) and later at Boies Schiller, and says those experiences shaped her litigation style and approach to building Pallas.

“I have effectively grown up in the US system and I’m probably one of the first generations of lawyers to do so,” she says. “Those experiences taught me how to lawyer like a US lawyer, how to litigate like a US lawyer, which is actually very different to the UK style.”

I have effectively grown up in the US system and I’m probably one of the first generations of lawyers to do so.

“US firms offer opportunity, a lack of rigidity and an exposure to work and clients that you wouldn’t otherwise get at the same level in a UK firm,” she says.

While she has nothing against UK firms, she says: “I have a strong preference to the US culture, the style of litigating at US firms, it’s a better fit for me.”

Whether that means something like the “uncooperative” negotiation style that Kirkland was recently called out for, she’s quick to clarify.

“I don’t subscribe to being aggressive for the sake of it. It’s about being strategic and creative in how you approach litigation in terms of finding solutions for clients.”

The talent model

Internally, Pallas runs lean, partner-led teams. “We do not run pyramid teams,” Harrison says. “Partners are very involved day to day.”

The model places a premium on cultural fit and an emphasis on early responsibility.

“We’re not for everyone. You have to subscribe to the culture and value system of the firm. We offer associates a quality of work, exposure and responsibility that they just can’t achieve in Big Law. They work outside their class here.”

We offer associates a quality of work, exposure and responsibility that they just can’t achieve in Big Law.

While Pallas has made headlines for surpassing the Cravath scale for associate bonuses, offering bonuses of up to $232,000 for both New York and London associates, Harrison says the firm is wary of attracting lawyers motivated primarily by pay.

“We don’t want to hire associates who are coming here for compensation,” Harrison says. “You can generally spot it quite quickly.”

Running the show

While she was once considered the next in line to succeed veteran litigator David Boies at Boies Schiller, she instead quit to start Pallas, a move that brought its own set of challenges.

“There’s a constant tug between the lawyering and the leading, which seems to mean I work very many hours,” she says.

In terms of the differences in her role as a managing partner at Boies Schiller versus starting her own firm, she points to the heightened sense of responsibility.

There’s no huge machine backing you and that just makes you even more driven at the end of the day.

“There’s no huge machine backing you and that just makes you even more driven at the end of the day.”

For the most part, she says, the experience has tracked the original vision.

“There have been certain unexpected twists and turns, but broadly, I had a very strong vision, and that’s what we’re achieving - and it’s very much a we.”

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read