Inside the psychology of lawyer burnout with Dr Catherine Sykes: why some burn out and others don't

The early signs lawyers miss and why burnout is often mistaken for productivity.

Inside the psychology of lawyer burnout with Dr Catherine Sykes: why some burn out and others don't
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Burnout has become a familiar theme in legal careers, but it remains poorly understood. Long hours and competitive environments are often treated as the main drivers, while far less attention is paid to the psychology that determines who burns out and who doesn’t.

That gap is where London-based psychologist Dr Catherine Sykes has spent much of her career. After starting out in academia researching the psychological factors that protect against burnout, she moved into private practice and gradually found herself working primarily with lawyers.

Nearly two decades on, her work focuses on how pressure, performance and personal identity intersect in the profession.

How it began

Sykes did not set out to work with lawyers. She started in academia, researching burnout among carers for people with Alzheimer’s disease, a group widely assumed to be at exceptionally high risk for burnout.

What she found challenged some of the prevailing assumptions about burnout.

Burnout, she explains, was not most strongly linked to how demanding the care itself was, or even to the level of disability involved. Instead, it was psychological variables - the way people related to pressure, responsibility and rest - that determined whether someone burned out or not.

After having her first child, Sykes decided to leave academia and gradually transition into private practice. She began slowly, opening a City office one day a week and offering what she knew best: burnout support.

“It just so happens that the majority of people that came through my door were lawyers and that was 17 years ago,” she says.

She eventually left academia altogether and built a full-time practice, expanding into coaching and services tailored specifically to lawyers.

What causes burnout for lawyers

There is no single cause of burnout, Sykes says. Instead, it emerges from a combination of individual traits and organisational conditions, a combination that appears frequently in legal environments.

“The environment of practising lawyers is highly competitive so naturally there’s going to be a lot of stress, but it’s also the expectations people put on themselves.”

Layered on top of that is a lack of control over time and workload. “Many lawyers don’t feel a sense of agency, they don’t feel in charge of their day or their workloads. When you pair stressful environments with high demand from clients, high demand on the self, low value of rest, low sense of agency…”

Perfectionism then completes the picture. “There is a fixed mindset that often comes along too. There’s this expectation to be perfect all the time and that your perfectionism needs to be effortless,” she says.

Over time, this can create friction. “This can create a disconnect between the body and the mind and people don’t notice those early warning signs or dismiss them as a sign of weakness - ‘I shouldn’t be feeling like this’ or ‘I used to be able to do all these things’.”

Early warning signs people miss

Burnout rarely arrives suddenly, even if it feels that way in hindsight. Sykes says the earliest signs are often subtle and easily rationalised away. The biggest red flag, she says, is irritability.

“If your energy is spent largely on work, you’re going to get irritated when people want something from you. Irritability with colleagues, with people at home - it’s a big sign that you’re on the track to burnout,” she says.

Another is a loss of motivation. “Everything feels a bit the same, like you’re dragging your heels a little bit, waking up and not feeling energised, like you could do with another night’s sleep.”

Irritability with colleagues, with people at home - it’s a big sign that you’re on the track to burnout.

At this stage, people often respond by doing more, not less. “If you’re burnt out, you’re doing too much of the wrong things. There’s often a fear of failure so people don’t challenge themselves, don’t grow and then become very stuck in doing more of the same, rather than something new and challenging,” she says.

That stagnation is particularly damaging for high performers. “We need challenges to feel alive, especially high performers. If you’re not reaching your potential because of fear of failure, you often get this misaligned feeling that you’re not giving as much as you could.”

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£47,000£49,000£88,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£50,000£54,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£43,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£45,000£47,000£84,000
Mischon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£135,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£60,000£65,000£165,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£52,000£57,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£170,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Burnout versus productivity

Burnout often masquerades as productivity, fuelled by adrenaline rather than alignment, particularly in environments that reward long hours and being seen as busy.

“At first, it can feel quite good, quite uplifting, but it’s just adrenaline,” she says.

“There’s a difference between feeling good because you’re running on adrenaline and feeling good because you’re aligned - your mind, body, relationships, work, your impact.”


Rest comes first

One of the biggest mistakes people make when they realise they are burnt out is trying to make big decisions too quickly.

“The first thing is rest. Don’t make any decisions when you’re burnt out,” she says.

“If you don’t address what you are bringing to that burnout, you might get another job and just repeat the same patterns.”

That advice often runs up against deeply ingrained beliefs some people hold about rest.

“There’s a mentality of it’s a bit embarrassing to take care of yourself. If you have to take care of yourself, maybe you’re not as strong as you think you are. It’s a badge of honour to be someone who does need rest, who can operate on only a small number of hours of sleep.”

There’s a mentality of it’s a bit embarrassing to take care of yourself.

Rest itself, she notes, is not straightforward when someone is already burnt out.

“When you’re in a burnout state, rest is difficult physiologically because you are hyper-alert and it’s hard to transition into a rest state, which is why pacing is important.” 

Sykes recommends building routines that include intentional rest. She says performance improves when periods of intense, cognitively demanding work are followed by lighter tasks, such as emails, before a short rest. That gradual step-down in intensity also makes it easier to enter a genuine state of rest.

Impostor syndrome (at every level)

Alongside burnout, Sykes also sees another closely linked pattern. Impostor syndrome, she says, is deeply misunderstood, including by those who experience it.

It tends to surface at transition points: the start of a career, moments of growth, or taking on new responsibilities.

When you’ve made partner, that’s when impostor syndrome creeps right back in because it’s a new challenge.

“When you’ve made partner, that’s when impostor syndrome creeps right back in because it’s a new challenge,” she says.

The coping strategies that follow are often counterproductive. “Procrastination or overworking are the go-to strategies.”

These behaviours are driven by automatic internal narratives: a constant pressure to stay busy or visible, the belief that slowing down means falling behind, that competence should look effortless, or that mistakes will expose a lack of readiness.

Because these narratives tend to operate in the background, they are rarely recognised in the moment, yet they shape behaviour and push people towards overworking, avoidance or excessive checking, ultimately undermining performance.

When tasks are eventually completed, success is often attributed to overworking or luck rather than ability, reinforcing the same pattern and allowing the cycle to repeat.


The high achiever paradigm

Underneath that behaviour is a long-learned pattern.

“Lawyers are high achievers. They’re used to being the best at school, best at university, places where they receive a lot of reinforcement, praise and recognition of their intelligence,” she says.

Over time, that reinforcement can become conditional.

“The nervous system learns ‘I’m only safe when I’m being better than other people.’ Now that’s hard when you work in law, because the reality is there are a lot of great people in your environment.”

What actually helps

For lawyers already operating at capacity, Sykes is wary of advice that adds yet another set of expectations. What helps most, she suggests, are small behavioural changes that reduce friction and fatigue, and promote clarity and connection.

One relatively easy change is to take steps to lower cognitive load. Decisions that repeat every day - what to wear, what to eat, when to exercise - quietly drain energy. She advises clients to simplify wardrobes so outfits mix easily, meal prep and keep a fixed exercise routine, rather than relying on motivation at the end of long hours.

Beliefs about sleep can also get in the way. Some people internalise the idea that sleep is a waste of time, or compare themselves to colleagues who claim to function for four hours a night. Sykes says those assumptions often need to be challenged, particularly when people are already operating close to burnout.

Social relationships function as a protective buffer against sustained stress, she says. They are often the first casualty of expanding workloads. Occasional late nights are unavoidable, but habitual withdrawal from relationships is more problematic and reduces resilience over time.

Peak performance

For Sykes, peak performance is not about lowering standards or softening ambition. It is about alignment and helping people reach a state where performance and wellbeing reinforce each other.

“Lawyers often don’t get the benefits of reaching their full potential, despite outward signs of success. A lot of lawyers are really intelligent people who are unhappy.”

A lot of lawyers are really intelligent people who are unhappy.

When that alignment is in place, she says, the dynamic shifts. 

“People enjoy coming to work for more than the money, the status, they get a bigger sense of purpose.”

“When you feel that what you’re doing is connected to who you are, your story, what you’re doing and where you came from and using that to create impact, you get a sense of peak performance, peak wellbeing, peak mood and you feel on top of the world.”

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000

All graphics reproduced with permission of Dr Catherine Sykes.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£50,000£55,000£115,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read
Advertisement