The ex-Slaughters lawyer taking Avvoka into legal AI’s next chapter

As lawyers spend more time inside AI platforms, specialist legal tech companies are rethinking where they fit.

The ex-Slaughters lawyer taking Avvoka into legal AI’s next chapter
Avvoka was founded by former Magic Circle lawyers David Howorth (L) and Eliot Benzecrit (R) (Credit: Avvoka)
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Legal tech company Avvoka is shifting towards a “headless drafting” model that lets lawyers access its technology without leaving platforms such as Harvey and Legora.

Co-founder Eliot Benzecrit says that means accepting an uncomfortable possibility: the best way to reach users may be through someone else’s product.

Legal tech company Avvoka is rethinking one of the basic assumptions of legal tech: that lawyers need to come to its platform to use it.

“I'm fighting for their attention, but they're living in Harvey,” says Avvoka co-founder Eliot Benzecrit.

It is a problem facing a growing number of specialist legal tech companies. Lawyers who once moved between separate tools for drafting, research and other tasks are increasingly spending their working day inside platforms such as Harvey, Legora, Claude or Copilot.

Avvoka's answer is to meet them there. Benzecrit calls the strategy “headless drafting", allowing a lawyer working within an AI platform to access Avvoka's contract drafting technology, possibly without ever opening Avvoka.

“Do we give the lawyer a better experience by forcing them to come to our UI,” he asks, “or accept that their attention might be elsewhere?”

OG status

It is a very different problem from the one Benzecrit faced when he started out in legal tech a decade ago. Benzecrit trained at Slaughter and May and qualified into M&A. He had little intention of leaving law until a side project eventually turned into Avvoka.

The London-based company was founded in the pre-generative AI days of 2016, with David Howorth, then a Slaughters trainee, joining Benzecrit early on.

When Benzecrit attended one of the first Legal Geek events in 2016, he remembers finding just six people in the room.

“What on earth have we done leaving our proper careers to turn up in a room with six people,” he remembers thinking.

He wasn’t the only former Slaughters lawyer taking a gamble on the nascent industry. StructureFlow founder Tim Follett, who also left the firm to build a legal tech startup, has similarly recalled attending Legal Geek when it was still a tiny gathering.

Today, the annual conference attracts around 5,000 attendees at its flagship event in London.

What on earth have we done leaving our proper careers to turn up in a room with six people.

At 25, the risk seemed manageable. Benzecrit had qualified as a lawyer and assumed he could simply return if the startup failed.

After bootstrapping for much of its existence, raising just £600,000 in its early years, the company spent more than eight years growing largely from its own revenues. Earlier this year, it raised £14 million to accelerate its US expansion and product development, including the integrations now underpinning its strategy.

The round was led by Valhalla Ventures, founded by Mark and Lindy O’Hare, who built private markets data platform Preqin and sold it to BlackRock for £2.5 billion last year.

Avvoka has since grown to around 120 employees and says it is used by a quarter of AmLaw 100 law firms. Its roster includes A&O Shearman and Ropes & Gray, as well as corporate teams such as Warner Brothers. Around 80% of its revenue comes from law firms, with 70% of that coming from the US.

The product has evolved with the market. Firms traditionally used Avvoka to turn their own precedents into automated templates. A lawyer generating a share purchase agreement might answer a questionnaire, with Avvoka assembling the document according to rules built into the template.

Avvoka now connects with Harvey, Legora, Claude and Copilot, allowing lawyers to remain inside those platforms while drawing on the rules and templates stored in Avvoka.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst Perkins Coie£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£150,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£172,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£90,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£55,000£60,000£140,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£120,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£65,000£70,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£108,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£145,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£170,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£52,500£57,500£110,000
Morgan Lewis£57,500£62,500£173,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£140,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£170,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£54,000£59,000£109,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£189,000
Reed Smith£55,000£60,000£135,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£56,000£61,000£130,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£177,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£50,000£54,000£90,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£180,000
Winston Taylor£56,000£61,000£125,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Speed versus trust

Benzecrit's take is that generative AI and rules-based automation solve different problems.

“AI gives you speed, but the potential trade off is accuracy,” he says.

A firm's Avvoka templates encode its own drafting decisions, including rules determining when particular clauses should appear. An AI tool can interact with those rules rather than generating an entire document from scratch.

That rules-based layer, Benzecrit argues, becomes particularly important as firms try to work out how much they can trust AI-generated legal work.

“If they've assembled the document via our infrastructure, then there's no need for any of that review time because it assembles it in accordance with the rules that their knowledge management team have enshrined,” he says.

Avvoka is also adding more AI of its own. Its Curate product analyses previous transaction documents to help lawyers build preferred precedents, while Draft Assist can take information from an email, voice recording or term sheet and use it to populate an automated document.

Amazon analogy

Benzecrit is not trying to turn Avvoka into another general-purpose AI destination.

He compares the emerging model to being a specialist seller on Amazon. If Harvey or another platform becomes where lawyers go to work, Avvoka can supply part of what they find there.

“We're quite happy to be one of the vendors on Amazon if Harvey is the Amazon,” he says.

We're quite happy to be one of the vendors on Amazon if Harvey is the Amazon.

“We ultimately just want lawyers to produce a really solid draft.”

It is a calculation Benzecrit thinks more specialist legal tech companies will have to make. Many were built as point solutions, with their own interfaces and direct relationships with users. But if lawyers increasingly spend their days inside a smaller number of AI platforms, owning that interface may matter less.

“We should be giving them the best chance of completing their workflow successfully,” he says.

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
•
5 min read
Advertisement