A legal psychologist on why law attracts neurodivergent people

Dr Catherine Sykes discusses why neurodiversity is overrepresented in law, and the benefits and challenges.

A legal psychologist on why law attracts neurodivergent people
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Dr Catherine Sykes, a psychologist who works with City lawyers, sees a significant number of neurodivergent patients in her practice.

She believes there may be an outsized representation of neurodivergence in the legal profession because of both the structure and intensity that a career in law offers.

While she is not keen on the word “disorder”, she says neurodiversity essentially means that someone’s brain works differently from the average person’s and is often associated with diagnoses such as ADHD, dyslexia or autism.

It’s estimated that around 4-5% of the UK population has ADHD or autism, existing on a spectrum, and that roughly 15% of people fall under the broader neurodivergent umbrella.

A study of lawyers funded by the American Bar Association found that 12.5% reported having ADHD, higher than estimates for the general population.

Why law attracts

While neurodiversity is often associated with workplace or personal challenges, Sykes said it can also explain why some people are particularly well suited to legal careers. For people with autism, law often provides structure and rule-based thinking, while for those with ADHD, it offers intensity, urgency and novelty.

“People with ADHD tend to seek novelty and intensity, enjoying the fast-paced environment and high stimulation,” she said.

People with ADHD tend to seek novelty and intensity...

“People who are on the autistic spectrum are very good at systemising - creating rules and recognising patterns - which can be very useful for a career in law. They see the world in a very different way, which can cultivate creativity,” she said.

Sykes cautioned against overstating the “advantages” of neurodivergence, but said certain cognitive differences can become real strengths in the right environment.

Overcompensating

While there can be benefits, neurodivergence also comes with challenges, particularly in high-pressure work environments.

“If you have ADHD, remaining consistent with your effort may be a challenge. There’s a lot of effort going on in the background to be consistent, what we call overcompensation,” she said.

Sykes said this can create a “self-reinforcing loop”, where people feel they are constantly just managing to keep up despite performing well externally.

“It creates this sense of: ‘I’ve just got away with this.’ If you constantly evaluate your performance, it keeps you on edge, removes some of the satisfaction and can lead to burnout,” she said.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£140,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£180,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£174,418
Taylor Wessing£52,000£57,000£115,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£180,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Communication styles

Communication can also become a challenge, particularly where different communication styles are misunderstood in workplace settings.

“People on the autistic spectrum tend to favour direct communication and that can sometimes be interpreted as blunt,” she said. “People with ADHD can be quite emotionally intense in their communication and that can sometimes be interpreted as too much.”

Sykes said these misunderstandings can affect colleague relationships and performance feedback.

“People with neurodiversity often require help in developing effective communication skills to express and adapt their communication,” she said.

The ‘flow state’

Sykes also pointed to the importance of understanding “struggle states” and “flow states” when managing focus and motivation.

She said many people with ADHD find it difficult to complete repetitive tasks and can become reliant on deadline pressure and adrenaline.

“It feels good in the moment because adrenaline improves focus, albeit only in the short term, but it’s not sustainable,” she said.

Instead, she said people with ADHD may benefit from introducing novelty into the early “struggle phase” of a task - for example by changing environments or working methods - to reach a state of flow.

By contrast, people with autism may benefit more from routine and consistency, such as time blocking, to achieve flow.

To disclose or not

Sykes said deciding whether to disclose a diagnosis at work remains a difficult judgement call and depends heavily on workplace culture.

“In an ideal world, the answer would be yes,” she said. “But I think there’s a judgement that has to be made about the culture you work in and whether it would genuinely be receptive.”

She said some organisations are increasingly open to adjustments and support, while others may still perceive neurodivergence as a weakness despite wider awareness efforts.

I think there’s a judgement that has to be made about the culture you work in...

Even without formal disclosure, Sykes said developing self-awareness and communication strategies can make a major difference.

“Self-awareness is the first step,” she said. “You have to understand how it shows up for you and how your brain works.”

She said practical coping strategies often include improving communication, developing conflict resolution skills and building sustainable routines to reduce overcompensation and burnout.

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000

On the agenda

Major UK law firms have been introducing neurodiversity initiatives, internal support networks and workplace adjustment programmes as awareness grows across the profession.

Freshfields’ head of risk management James Smither co-founded the Legal Neurodiversity Network in 2023 to help make the legal industry more neuro-inclusive. The organisation has since grown to include more than 100 member firms.

Other firms have also expanded internal support efforts. HSF Kramer launched a neurodiversity mentoring programme last year designed to help neurodivergent professionals better navigate the workplace, while Pinsent Masons operates an internal Neurodiversity Network focused on employee support, education and awareness.

Social media effect

Awareness of neurodivergence has grown in recent years, fuelled in part by social media platforms where people increasingly share their personal experiences - particularly, according to Sykes, during the pandemic when many people lost the coping mechanisms and routines they relied on.

While that initially led to greater openness and destigmatisation, she believes there has recently been a swing back towards scepticism and misunderstanding, fuelled in part by misinformation online.

There is a lot of misinformation...on Instagram or TikTok.

Sykes warned that misinformation surrounding neurodivergence has become a growing problem online and encouraged people to seek out trusted clinical and academic sources rather than relying on social media personalities.

“There is a lot of misinformation and I recommend that people go to reliable sources, not just someone who has an opinion on ADHD or autism on Instagram or TikTok,” she said.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£55,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read
Advertisement