What law firms can learn about talent retention from the merger wave

Law firms pursuing mergers often focus on strategy and financial performance, but uncertainty can also increase talent attrition.

What law firms can learn about talent retention from the merger wave
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

As law firms continue their pursuit of transatlantic growth, frequently through mergers, leaders face a challenge that can’t be solved through scale: keeping hold of their people.

This year will see at least three major transatlantic law firm mergers: Ashurst and Perkins Coie, Taylor Wessing and Winston & Strawn, and Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader.

Collectively, there have been more than 40 partner departures in the past six months from these firms involved in upcoming mergers, 19 of which were in the UK.

Following merger announcements, it’s common to see increased partner attrition - data provider Pirical previously pegged the average at 4%, though some firms exceed that figure. Between the merger announcements and completions, Shearman & Sterling and Bryan Cave - now BCLP - saw 9% and 8% partner attrition according to Pirical.

Though paradoxically, the firms currently undergoing mergers have gained more partners than they have lost, at least in London, according to recruitment firm Edwards Gibson.

This is an atypical pattern as elevated partner attrition is common in the lead up to and  following mergers. Following the formation of A&O Shearman, the firm cut 10% of its global partnership, approximately 80 partners, citing overlapping capabilities.

The firm also closed its Johannesburg office and additional partners left on their own accord bringing the total to around 190 partners departing since the merger announcement. The firm reportedly began holding certain partners to longer notice periods as the departures mounted.

Uncertain times

Periods of change naturally create uncertainty. Partners wonder how a merger will affect their practice, associates question what opportunities will exist in the new organisation and competitors begin calling.

James Hacking, chief executive of legal consultancy Kindleworth, said: “The scale and ambition behind these combinations is undeniable, but large mergers inevitably force partners to ask hard questions about where they fit within the new organisation.”

Competitor firms often capitalise on the disruption by presenting as a more stable or attractive landing spot for partners weighing their options.

Eleonora Wäktare, a London-based partner at legal recruiting firm Macrae, said: “Law firm mergers are among the most significant events in the life of a firm.

“For individual partners, they may raise questions such as: Do they agree with the leadership’s chosen strategy? How does the arrival of a large group of new partners affect their practice? How will the new entity be organised, in terms of decision-making and compensation systems? What will the impact be on culture?”

The human side

For Cheryl Donaldson, a leadership adviser who sees clients in the US and London, the current merger wave highlights a familiar challenge.

During mergers, organisations become focused on strategy, financial performance and integration plans, while the human side of change often receives less attention.

Donaldson has spent more than 30 years working with high performers and has close ties to the legal profession coming from a third-generation legal family: her father, husband, brother and son are all lawyers.

As firms navigate mergers, she believes retaining talent comes down to a few core principles.

"I think that three things are really important," she said. "Connection, structure and expectation."

Donaldson believes leaders often underestimate how important regular connection becomes during these moments.

She says firms that stay closely connected to their people are more likely to identify concerns before they turn into departures.

"If they are connected, they are hearing these concerns," she said. “The have a chance to problem-solve how to retain them."

"When they lose that talent, it impacts the whole system," she said.

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£145,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£52,000£57,000£130,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£110,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£140,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£50,000£55,000£100,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£140,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£189,000
Reed Smith£53,000£58,000£125,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£177,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£180,000
Winston Taylor£52,000£57,000£115,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement

Creating stability

Connection alone is not enough. Donaldson says that lawyers also need structure during periods of uncertainty. Clear communication around career progression, responsibilities and opportunities can help reduce anxiety about the future.

Leadership teams should be actively discussing how lawyers fit into the merged organisation rather than assuming people will simply wait for answers.

"If you stay here, here are some ways that we can see growth for you," Donaldson said. "Here are some of the ways that we can make this happen for you."

Providing that sense of direction can be particularly important when rival firms are actively targeting talent.

Leading with curiosity

Beyond retention, Donaldson believes culture integration is one of the biggest challenges facing firms pursuing transatlantic combinations.

"The one thing that is really key with US-UK mergers is for both sides to lead with curiosity, and adopt a learner’s attitude,” she said.

The risk, she argues, is that leaders approach mergers assuming their existing way of working is the correct one.

"Sometimes when new leaders come in during a stressful time, they lead with answers and not curiosity," she said.

She notes that it can be particularly difficult for lawyers.

"I don't know if lawyers are always the most curious," Donaldson said. “They have been trained to have answers."

She says that firms often spend significant time focused on strategy, financial performance and integration plans, but can overlook the importance of helping people feel heard and valued throughout the process.

"I think you are going to retain talent when people feel valued," she said. "At the end of the day, that's really the most important thing."

FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£56,000£61,000£140,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read
Advertisement