The all-nighter that led an ex-Quinn litigator to build an AI startup

Hanna Roos discusses why she left Big Law to build out her vision for how companies should manage disputes.

The all-nighter that led an ex-Quinn litigator to build an AI startup
Supported by
Get the newsletter that keeps lawyers ahead
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Need to know

Hanna Roos has pulled plenty of late nights as a City disputes lawyer, but one filing pushed things further than usual.

She and her colleagues had been preparing a brief for a sovereign state until three in the morning. Realising it would take about two hours to commute home and back, she decided to grab a few hours of sleep under her desk and wake up early to finish.

"I woke up at 5 am because there was a woman standing over me and she was shrieking. I had never met her, so I started shrieking. She was the cleaning lady and she was not expecting a body under the desk,” she says.

Today she laughs about the story, but at the time it made her question the way things worked.

“I thought, okay, this sector is not optimised for whatever it is that we're trying to do,” she says.

That moment eventually set her on a path to founding Aavagard, a litigation boutique built around charging for outcomes rather than hours.

Later came Aavalynx, a legal technology company using AI to help in-house corporate teams manage disputes, which recently raised £1.5 million.

On being different

"I'm not at all a usual person," she says, before laughing. "I don't think any entrepreneur is."

Growing up as the eldest of 12 children in a devoutly religious family in Finland, she learned responsibility early. Leadership came naturally, as did questioning convention.

“I was very young when I said that religion wasn’t for me. It was a major disruption in the family story culturally, and it was devastating to my parents,” she says.

I wasn’t afraid to be different, do things differently, and to fail.

“It gave me the muscle later on to go, I remember what it feels like to disappoint and disrupt, and I’m okay.”

She says that experience built her comfort in challenging expectations, a mindset she carried into her legal career.

Roos trained at Freshfields before joining Latham & Watkins and later Quinn Emanuel in London, but even inside some of the world’s top law firms, she found herself questioning long-held assumptions about how legal services should be delivered.

“I wasn’t afraid to be different, do things differently, and to fail,” she says.

Realising the vision

Leaving private practice gave Roos the chance to build the kind of legal business she felt was missing from the market.

"I looked at the market and thought there is no existing institution I want to be in because I want to create genuine disruption," she says.

She recalls feeling constrained by the hierarchy of large firms, where challenging established ways of working often proved difficult.

"I felt like it was this very grey echo chamber where I couldn't speak truth to power. I couldn't say what I actually thought.”

She founded Aavagard in 2021, a disputes boutique built around charging for resolutions rather than hours. But as generative AI emerged, she realised technology could push that vision much further.

Starting her own business gave her the freedom to test ideas she believed the legal industry had been slow to embrace, from alternative pricing models to using AI to help clients make better decisions about disputes.

Disrupting the model

Roos has no bone to pick with the law itself. In fact, she remains passionate about the profession, pointing to her work supporting Kenya in claims brought by survivors of torture during the Mau Mau uprising as the kind of litigation that reminded her why she became a lawyer.

But beneath it, sits a commercial model that she believes often works against clients' interests.

"Because law firms get paid for volume of work, they don't have an immediate incentive to resolve disputes as fast as clients want resolutions. The idea was: charge for resolutions, not for time."

While much of legal AI has focused on helping lawyers draft documents or review contracts more efficiently, Roos believes the bigger opportunity lies in helping companies resolve disputes sooner.

"A law firm can be more efficient by using AI on a six-year dispute," she says. “But the real disruption is you resolve it in six months."

She argues companies should use technology to decide earlier whether to settle, fight or pursue another strategy, rather than simply making lawyers more efficient.

As she puts it: "Good tools make disputes efficient. Great ones make them disappear.”

The trade-offs

Roos wants to help businesses understand the full commercial impact of a dispute before it turns into years of litigation.

Aavalynx is designed to bring together a company's legal, commercial and operational data into a single platform, allowing in-house teams to model different scenarios and understand the financial consequences of fighting, settling or pursuing another strategy.

The platform factors in external legal fees, management time, reputational risk and the potential impact on future business opportunities. She likens it to an aircraft cockpit.

"If you are the pilot, what we give you is the panel you need to see in front of you to fly safely," she says.

Instead of relying solely on legal advice, she argues in-house teams can make decisions with a much clearer picture of the commercial trade-offs.

"The in-house team ends up looking like superheroes to the commercial leaders because they are finally speaking about disputes in terms of numbers."

Getting joy back

Talk to Roos for long enough and the conversation repeatedly returns to a word not often associated with litigation: joy.

"The law is a talent business that does not realise it's a talent business," she says.

She believes firms have historically focused almost exclusively on technical excellence while paying too little attention to leadership and human performance.

If you stare at a problem for 16 hours, it takes you longer and the outcome is worse...

"What you really need to do to lead well in the law is to view your team as elite athletes."

Drawing on cognitive science and performance coaching, she believes lawyers produce their best thinking when they have time to recover rather than simply working longer.

"If you stare at a problem for 16 hours, it takes you longer and the outcome is worse than if you put the problem down and go do something else,” she says.

The ‘passion economy’

Roos believes AI will ultimately reduce demand for junior lawyers, but she argues the profession shouldn't romanticise the existing model.

"What we pretend in this discussion is that the world pre-AI was somehow perfect,” she says.

Instead, she believes technology will create room for lawyers who genuinely enjoy the work.

"This is really an opportunity to create a passion economy where the lawyers who really love the law do it… and the ones who don't really love the law can pursue their first passion."

Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Addleshaw Goddard£52,000£56,000£100,000
Akin£60,000£65,000£174,418
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Baker McKenzie£56,000£61,000£150,000
Bird & Bird£48,500£53,500£102,000
Bristows£48,000£52,000£95,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Burges Salmon£49,500£51,500£76,000
Charles Russell Speechlys£52,000£55,000£93,000
Cleary Gottlieb£62,500£67,500£164,500
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clyde & Co£48,500£51,000£85,000
CMS£50,000£55,000£120,000
Cooley£55,000£60,000£157,000
Davis Polk £65,000£70,000£180,000
Debevoise £55,000£60,000£173,000
Dechert£55,000£61,000£165,000
Dentons£52,000£56,000£104,000
DLA Piper£55,000£60,000£140,000
Eversheds Sutherland£50,000£55,000£120,000
Farrer & Co£48,500£51,000£89,000
Fieldfisher£48,500£52,000£100,000
Freshfields£56,000£61,000£150,000
Fried Frank£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gibson Dunn£60,000£65,000£180,000
Goodwin Procter£55,000£60,000£175,000
Gowling WLG£48,500£53,500£105,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
HFW£52,000£56,000£103,500
Hill Dickinson£44,000£45,000£80,000
Hogan Lovells£56,000£61,000£145,000
Irwin Mitchell£43,500£45,500£78,000
Jones Day£60,000£68,000£165,000
K&L Gates£50,000£55,000£115,000
Kennedys£43,000£46,000£85,000
King & Spalding£62,000£67,000£175,000
Kirkland & Ellis£60,000£65,000£174,418
Latham & Watkins£60,000£65,000£174,418
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Mayer Brown£55,000£60,000£150,000
McDermott Will & Schulte£65,000£70,000£174,418
Milbank£65,000£70,000£174,418
Mills & Reeve£46,800£47,000£84,000
Mishcon de Reya£52,500£57,500£110,000
Norton Rose Fulbright£56,000£61,000£140,000
Orrick£60,000£65,000£160,000
Osborne Clarke£55,500£57,500£97,000
Paul Hastings£60,000£68,000£173,000
Paul Weiss£60,000£65,000£180,000
Penningtons Manches Cooper£48,000£50,000£83,000
Pinsent Masons£52,000£57,000£105,000
Quinn Emanueln/an/a£189,000
Reed Smith£55,000£60,000£135,000
Ropes & Gray£62,000£67,000£170,000
RPC£48,000£52,000£95,000
Shoosmiths£45,000£47,000£105,000
Sidley Austin£60,000£65,000£175,000
Simmons & Simmons£54,000£59,000£120,000
Simpson Thachern/an/a£178,000
Skadden£58,000£63,000£177,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Squire Patton Boggs£50,000£55,000£110,000
Stephenson Harwood£50,000£55,000£105,000
Sullivan & Cromwell£65,000£70,000£177,000
TLT£44,000£47,500£85,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Trowers & Hamlins£47,000£51,000£85,000
Vinson & Elkins£60,000£65,000£173,077
Watson Farley & Williams£51,500£56,000£107,000
Weightmans£36,000£38,000£70,000
Weil £60,000£65,000£170,000
White & Case£62,000£67,000£175,000
Willkie Farr & Gallagher£60,000£65,000£180,000
Winston Taylor£56,000£61,000£125,000
Withers£47,000£52,000£95,000
Womble Bond Dickinson£43,000£45,000£83,000
Rank
Law Firm
Revenue
Profit per Equity
Partner (PEP)
1DLA Piper*£3,130,000,000£2,500,000
2A&O Shearman£2,900,000,000£2,000,000
3Clifford Chance£2,400,000,000£2,100,000
4Hogan Lovells£2,320,000,000£2,400,000
5Linklaters£2,320,000,000£2,200,000
6Freshfields£2,250,000,000Not disclosed
7CMS**£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
8Norton Rose Fulbright*£1,800,000,000Not disclosed
9HSF Kramer£1,360,000,000£1,400,000
10Ashurst£1,030,000,000£1,390,000
11Clyde & Co£854,000,000Not disclosed
12Eversheds Sutherland£769,000,000£1,400,000
13Pinsent Masons£680,000,000£790,000
14Slaughter and May***£650,000,000Not disclosed
15BCLP*£640,000,000£790,000
16Simmons & Simmons£615,000,000£1,120,000
17Bird & Bird**£580,000,000£720,000
18Addleshaw Goddard£550,000,000£1,000,000
19Taylor Wessing£526,000,000£1,100,000
20Osborne Clarke**£476,000,000£800,000
21DWF£466,000,000Not disclosed
22Womble Bond Dickinson£450,000,000Not disclosed
23Kennedys£428,000,000Not disclosed
24Fieldfisher£385,000,000£1,000,000
25Macfarlanes£371,000,000£3,100,000

What do City lawyers actually do each day?

For a closer look at the day-to-day of some of the most common types of lawyers working in corporate law firms, explore our lawyer job profiles:

Advertisement
FirmLondon office sinceKnown for in London
Akin 1997Restructuring, funds
Baker McKenzie1961Finance, capital markets, TMT
Davis Polk1972Leveraged finance, corporate/M&A
Gibson Dunn1979Private equity, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Goodwin2008Private equity, funds, life sciences
Kirkland & Ellis1994Private equity, funds, restructuring
Latham & Watkins1990Finance, private equity, capital markets
McDermott Will & Schulte1998Finance, funds, healthcare
Milbank1979Finance, capital markets, energy, resources and infrastructure
Paul Hastings1997Leveraged finance, structured finance, infrastructure
Paul Weiss2001Private equity, leveraged finance
Quinn Emanuel2008Litigation
Sidley Austin1974Leveraged finance, capital markets, corporate/M&A
Simpson Thacher1978Leveraged finance, private equity, funds
Skadden1988Finance, corporate/M&A, arbitration
Sullivan & Cromwell1972Corporate/M&A, restructuring, capital markets
Weil1996Restructuring, private equity, leverage finance
White & Case1971Capital markets, arbitration, energy, resources and infrastructure
Law firmTypeFirst-year salary
White & CaseUS firm£32,000
Stephenson HarwoodInternational£30,000
A&O ShearmanMagic Circle£28,000
Charles Russell SpeechlysInternational£28,000
FreshfieldsMagic Circle£28,000
Herbert Smith FreehillsSilver Circle£28,000
Hogan LovellsInternational£28,000
LinklatersMagic Circle£28,000
Mishcon de ReyaInternational£28,000
Norton Rose FulbrightInternational£28,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
A&O Shearman£56,000£61,000£150,000
Clifford Chance£56,000£61,000£150,000
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer£56,000£61,000£150,000
Linklaters£56,000£61,000£150,000
Slaughter and May£56,000£61,000£150,000
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
FirmMerger yearKnown for in London
BCLP2018Real estate, corporate/M&A, litigation
DLA Piper2005Corporate/M&A, real estate, energy, resources and infrastructure
Eversheds Sutherland2017Corporate/M&A, finance
Hogan Lovells2011Litigation, regulation, finance
Mayer Brown2002Finance, capital markets, real estate
Norton Rose Fulbright2013Energy, resources and infrastructure, insurance, finance
Reed Smith2007Shipping, finance, TMT
Squire Patton Boggs2011Corporate/M&A, pensions, TMT
Law Firm
Trainee First Year
Trainee Second Year
Newly Qualified (NQ)
Ashurst£57,000£62,000£140,000
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner£53,000£58,000£125,000
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer£56,000£61,000£145,000
Macfarlanes£60,000£65,000£150,000
Travers Smith£55,000£60,000£130,000
Author of blog post.
Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read
Advertisement